Multisite prospective study of perioperative pain management practices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents: Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network (SPAIN) Project Report.

INTRODUCTION: Although 200 000 adolescents undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery annually, no benchmarks for pediatric post-ACLR pain management exist. We created a multicenter, prospective, observational registry to describe pain practices, pain, and functional recovery after pediatric ACLR. METHODS: Participants (n=519; 12-17.5 years) were enrolled from 15 sites over 2 years. Data on perioperative management and surgical factors were collected. Pain/opioid use and Lysholm scores were assessed preoperatively, on postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, week 6, and month 6. Descriptive statistics and trends for opioid use, pain, and function are presented. RESULTS: Regional analgesia was performed in 447/519 (86%) subjects; of these, adductor canal single shot was most frequent (54%), nerve catheters placed in 24%, and perineural adjuvants used in 43%. On POD1, POD3, week 6, and month 6, survey response rates were 73%, 71%, 61%, and 45%, respectively. Over these respective time points, pain score >3/10 was reported by 64% (95% CI: 59% to 69%), 46% (95% CI: 41% to 52%), 5% (95% CI: 3% to 8%), and 3% (95% CI: 1% to 6%); the number of daily oxycodone doses used was 2.8 (SD 0.19), 1.8 (SD 0.13), 0, and 0. There was considerable variability in timing and tests for postdischarge functional assessments. Numbness and weakness were reported by 11% and 4% at week 6 (n=315) and 16% and 2% at month 6 (n=233), respectively. CONCLUSION: We found substantial variability in the use of blocks to manage post-ACLR pain in children, with a small percentage experiencing long-term pain and neurological symptoms. Studies are needed to determine best practices for regional anesthesia and functional assessments in this patient population.

Incomplete sensorimotor paresis after upper abdominal surgery with TEA and spinal epidural lipomatosis: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: This case report documents a postoperative, incomplete sensorimotor paraparesis from thoracic vertebral body 6 (Th6) after combined anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery in a patient who had a thoracic localization of spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL). CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was treated in our clinic with a thoracic epidural catheter (TEA) for perioperative analgesia during a partial duodenopancreatectomy. Paraparetic symptoms occurred 20 hours after surgery. Initial MRI did not show bleeding, infection or spinal cord damage and the neurosurgeon consultants recommended observation. The neurological examination and the third follow-up MRI on 15th postoperative day showed ventrolateral damage of the spinal cord at level Th6. It is possible that local anesthetic compressed the spinal cord in addition to the existing lipomatosis and the thoracic kyphosis. The paraparesis improved during follow-up paraplegiologic treatment. CONCLUSION: So far, only two uncomplicated lumbar epidural catheter anesthesias have been described in patients who had a lumbar SEL. Epidural catheter anesthesia is a safe and effective method of pain control. But it is important to carefully identify and stratify patients with risk factors during the premedication visit. In patients who had kyphosis and thoracic localization of SEL, TEA may only be used after a risk-benefit assessment.

Intravenous versus oral acetaminophen for pain and quality of recovery after ambulatory spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: As ambulatory spine surgery increases, efficient recovery and discharge become essential. Multimodal analgesia is superior to opioids alone. Acetaminophen is a central component of multimodal protocols and both intravenous and oral forms are used. While some advantages for intravenous acetaminophen have been touted, prospective studies with patient-centered outcomes are lacking in ambulatory spine surgery. A substantial cost difference exists. We hypothesized that intravenous acetaminophen would be associated with fewer opioids and better recovery. METHODS: Patients undergoing ambulatory spine surgery were randomized to preoperative oral placebo and intraoperative intravenous acetaminophen or preoperative oral acetaminophen. All patients received general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was 24-hour opioid use in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), beginning with arrival to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included pain, Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, recovery time, and correlations between pain catastrophizing, QoR-15, and pain. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included in final analyses. Demographics were similar between groups. For the primary outcome, the median 24-hour MMEs did not differ between groups (12.6 (4.0, 27.1) vs 12.0 (4.0, 29.5) mg, p=0.893). Postoperative pain ratings, PACU MMEs, QoR-15 scores, and recovery time showed no differences. Spearman's correlation showed a moderate negative correlation between postoperative opioid use and QoR-15. CONCLUSION: Intravenous acetaminophen was not superior to the oral form in ambulatory spine surgery patients. This does not support routine use of the more expensive intravenous form to improve recovery and accelerate discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04574778.

Multimodal pain management and postoperative outcomes in inpatient and outpatient shoulder arthroplasties: a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesia has been associated with reduced opioid utilization, opioid-related complications, and improved recovery in various orthopedic surgeries; however, large sample size data is lacking for shoulder surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review using the Premier Healthcare Database of patients who underwent inpatient or outpatient (reverse, total, partial) shoulder arthroplasty from 2010 to 2019. Opioid-only analgesia was compared with multimodal analgesia, categorized into 1, 2, or >2 additional analgesic modes, with/without a nerve block. Multivariable regression models measured associations between multimodal analgesia and opioid charges (in oral morphine equivalents (OME)), cost and length of stay, and opioid-related adverse effects (approximated by naloxone use). We report % change and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Among 176 225 procedures, 169 679 (75.7% multimodal analgesia use) and 6546 (37.8% multimodal analgesia use) were inpatient and outpatient shoulder arthroplasties, respectively. Among inpatients, multimodal analgesia (>2 modes) without a nerve block (vs opioid-only analgesia) was associated with adjusted reductions in OMEs on postoperative day 1: -19.4% (95% CI -21.2% to -17.6%/representing unadjusted median OME reductions from 45 to 30 mg). For total hospitalization, this was -6.0% (95% CI -7.2% to -4.9%/representing unadjusted median OME reductions from 173 to 135 mg). Conversely, for outpatients, this was +13.7% change in OMEs (95% CI +4.4% to +23.0%/representing unadjusted median OME increases from 110 to 131 mg). In both settings, addition of a nerve block to multimodal analgesia attenuated effects in terms of opioid charges. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia is associated with reductions in opioid charges-specifically inpatient setting-but not various other outcomes.

Lessons learnt in evidence-based perioperative pain medicine: changing the focus from the medication and procedure to the patient.

Over time, the focus of evidence-based acute pain medicine has shifted, from a focus on drugs and interventions (characterized by numbers needed to treat), to an appreciation of procedure-specific factors (characterized by guidelines and meta-analyses), and now anesthesiologists face the challenge to integrate our current approach with the concept of precision medicine. Psychometric and biopsychosocial markers can potentially guide clinicians on who may need more aggressive perioperative pain management, or who would respond particularly well to a given analgesic intervention. The challenge will be to identify an easily assessable set of parameters that will guide perioperative physicians in tailoring the analgesic strategy to procedure and patient.

Relation of Early Mobility With Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Pain in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relation of mobility with abdominal symptoms and pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. DESIGN: The study has a prospective, correlational design. METHODS: The study sample included 130 patients who underwent abdominal surgery. Data were gathered with a sociodemographic and clinical features form, the Patient and Observer Mobility Scale, a patient mobility checklist, the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Higher scores on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale show more severe symptoms (max scores: 21 on abdominal pain, 14 on reflux, 21 on diarrhea, 28 on distension, and 21 on constipation). The frequency of mobility and the severity of pain was evaluated from the postoperative first day until discharge. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated on the postoperative seventh day. FINDINGS: The mean time elapsing till the first postoperative mobility was 22.13 ± 0.57 hours. The mean score was 7.61 ± 0.19 on abdominal pain, 11.94 ± 0.23 on distension, 2.04 ± 0.32 on reflux, 5.02 ± 0.32 on diarrhea, and 4.65 ± 0.24 on constipation. As the difficulty in mobility increased, the frequency of patient mobility decreased, and pain severity increased. As the difficulty in mobility increased, so did the duration of abdominal pain, diarrhea, indigestion, reflux, and time elapsing until the first intestinal gas passed after surgery. As the frequency of mobility increased, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and time elapsing till the first intestinal gas after surgery decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that increased mobility had a positive relationship with the reduction of gastrointestinal symptoms and pain. Therefore, interventions directed toward increasing patient mobility should be performed.

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy between Levobupivacaine 0.25% and Ropivacaine 0.375% for PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) Block in the Context of Hip Fracture Surgery of Elderly Patients: A Single-Center, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial.

Previous studies have compared levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine in various peripheral nerve blocks in terms of block duration, quality of analgesia, and onset time, but this has not occurred in the PENG block. Here, a single-center, randomized, and controlled clinical trial is presented. One hundred and twenty patients older than 65 years suffering from hip fractures and surgically treated at our institution under spinal anesthesia were eligible for participation; of them, one hundred and eight were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided PENG blocks using 20 mL of either 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.375% ropivacaine (both of which are equipotent concentrations). The primary endpoint was to compare the analgesic duration (time to first rescue) and analgesic quality (pain scores using the VAS, PAINAD, and AlgoPlus scales) between the groups. Secondary endpoints included comparing the onset time, describing the need for and type of rescue analgesics, and possible associated adverse effects. There were no statistically significant differences in analgesic duration between levobupivacaine (median 861.0, IQR 960) and ropivacaine (median 1205.0, IQR 1379; p = 0.069). Likewise, the quality of analgesia and onset time were comparable among the groups. A small number of patients required opioids as rescue analgesics (4.6%). The possible associated adverse effects included postoperative infection (11.1%) and delirium (2.8%).

Plantar compartment block for hallux valgus surgery: a proof-of-concept anatomic and clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Hallux valgus surgery is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. We hypothesized that a plantar compartment block may be a good technique for postoperative analgesia. We describe an anatomic approach to ultrasound-guided plantar compartment block and assess the clinical efficacy of the block for outpatient surgery. METHODS: The anatomic study was aimed to describe the plantar compartment, using both dissection methods and imaging, and to define a volume of local anesthetic. Patients scheduled for hallux valgus surgery with a popliteal sciatic nerve block, and combined plantar compartment and peroneal blocks were included in the clinical study. Data on attaining the criteria for rapid exit from the outpatient center, duration of sensory and analgesic block, visual analog scale (VAS) values for postoperative pain at rest and during movement, and the consumption of morphine as rescue analgesia were recorded. RESULTS: Plane-by-plane dissections and cross-sections were done in five cadaveric lower limbs. The medial calcaneal nerve divides into medial plantar and lateral plantar nerves in the upper part of the plantar compartment. These nerves were surrounded by 5 mL of colored gelatin, and 10 mL of injectates dye spread to the medial calcaneal branches. Thirty patients (26 women) were included in the clinical study. There were no failures of surgical block. Ninety per cent of patients successfully passed functional testing for ambulatory exit from the center within 5 hours (25th-75th centiles, 3.8-5.5 hours). The median duration of plantar compartment sensory block was 17.3 hours (10.5-21.5 hours), and the first request for rescue analgesic was 11.75 hours (10.5-23 hours) after surgery. The median VAS score for maximum pain reported within the 48-hour period was 2 (1-6). Twelve patients received 2.5 mg (0-5 mg) of morphine on day 1. Patients were highly satisfied and no adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This anatomic description of the ultrasound-guided plantar compartment block reported the injection area to target the medial and lateral plantar nerves with 5 mL of local anesthetic. Normal walking without assistance is attained rapidly with this regional anesthesia technique, and the time to request postoperative analgesia after hallux valgus surgery is long. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03815422.

Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous auricular nerve stimulation (neuromodulation) is an analgesic technique involving the percutaneous implantation of multiple leads at various points on/around the ear followed by the delivery of electric current using an external pulse generator. A device is currently available within the USA cleared to treat symptoms from opioid withdrawal, and multiple reports suggest a possible postoperative analgesic effect. The current randomized, controlled pilot study was undertaken to (1) determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent definitive clinical trial and (2) estimate the treatment effect of auricular neuromodulation on postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Within the recovery room following primary, unilateral, total knee arthroplasty, an auricular neuromodulation device (NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo, Irvine, California, USA) was applied using three percutaneous leads and one ground electrode. Participants were randomized to 5 days of either electrical stimulation or sham stimulation in a double-masked fashion. Participants were discharged with the stimulator in situ and removed the disposable devices at home. The dual primary treatment effect outcome measures were the cumulative opioid use (oral oxycodone) and the mean of the "average" daily pain measured with the Numeric Rating Scale for the first 5 postoperative days. RESULTS: During the first five postoperative days, oxycodone consumption in participants given active stimulation (n=15) was a median (IQR) of 4 mg (2-12) vs 13 mg (5-23) in patients given sham (n=15) treatment (p=0.039). During this same period, the average pain intensity in patients given active stimulation was a median (IQR) of 2.5 (1.5-3.3) vs 4.0 (3.6-4.8) in those given sham (p=0.014). Awakenings due to pain over all eight postoperative nights in participants given active stimulation was a median (IQR) of 5 (3-8) vs 11 (4-14) in those given sham (p<0.001). No device-related localized cutaneous irritation, systemic side effects, or other adverse events were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation reduced pain scores and opioid requirements during the initial week after total knee arthroplasty. Given the ease of application as well as the lack of systemic side effects and reported complications, a definitive clinical trial appears warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05521516.

Cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: 12-month and cost-effectiveness results from the multicenter COCOGEN trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) treatment of the genicular nerves reduces chronic knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this study is to compare long-term outcomes of cooled and conventional RF and perform an economic evaluation. METHODS: The COCOGEN trial is a double-blinded, non-inferiority, pilot, randomized controlled trial that compared the effects up to 12 months of cooled and conventional RF in patients with chronic knee pain suffering from OA or PPSP after TKA following a 1:1 randomization rate. Outcomes were knee pain, functionality, quality of life, emotional health, medication use, and adverse events. A trial-based economic evaluation was performed with a 12-month societal perspective. Here, the primary outcome was the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). RESULTS: 41 of the 49 included patients completed the 12-month follow-up. One patient in the PPSP cooled RF group had substantial missing data at 12-month follow-up. The proportion of patients with ≥50% pain reduction at 12 months was 22.2% (4/18) in patients treated with conventional RF versus 22.7% (5/22) in patients treated with cooled RF (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean absolute numerical rating scale at 12 months after cooled RF and conventional RF in patients with PPSP (p=0.02). Differences between other outcomes were not statistically significant. The health economic analysis indicated that cooled RF resulted in lower costs and improved QALYs compared with conventional RF in PPSP but not in OA. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Both RF treatments demonstrated in approximately 22% of patients a ≥50% pain reduction at 12 months. In patients with PPSP, contrary to OA, cooled RF seems to be more effective than conventional RF. Additionally, cooled RF has in patients with PPSP, as opposed to OA, greater effectiveness at lower costs compared with conventional RF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03865849.

Effects of combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to peripheral nerve blocks: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE: The effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and BIOSIS until June 8, 2023. RCTs with adults undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block randomized to combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine versus placebo or other adjuncts were eligible. Primary outcome was duration of analgesia. We performed meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, risk of bias-2, and Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment. FINDINGS: We included 9 RCTs with 14 eligible comparisons. The combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine was compared with placebo in three RCTs (173 participants), dexamethasone in seven (569 participants), and dexmedetomidine in four (281 participants). The duration of analgesia was likely increased with the combination versus placebo (mean difference 460 min, 95% CI 249 to 671) and versus dexmedetomidine (mean difference 388 min, 95% CI 211 to 565). The duration was likely similar with the combination versus dexamethasone (mean difference 50 min, 95% CI -140 to 239). The certainty of the evidence was moderate because most trials were at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine likely increased the duration of analgesia when compared with placebo and dexmedetomidine. The combination likely provided a similar duration of analgesia as dexamethasone. Based on this systematic review, it seems reasonable to use dexamethasone as the sole adjunct if the goal is to increase the duration of analgesia.

Differential nerve blockade to explain anterior thoracic analgesia without sensory blockade after an erector spinae plane block may be wishful thinking.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is currently used as a component of multimodal analgesic regimen in a multitude of indications but the mechanism by which it produces anterior thoracic analgesia remains a subject of controversy. This is primarily the result of ESPB's failure to consistently produce cutaneous sensory blockade (to pinprick and cold sensation) over the anterior hemithorax. Nevertheless, ESPB appears to provide 'clinically meaningful analgesia' in various clinical settings. Lately, it has been proposed that the discrepancy between clinical analgesia and cutaneous sensory blockade could be the result of differential nerve blockade at the level of the dorsal root ganglion. In particular, it is claimed that at a low concentration of local anesthetic, the C nerve fibers would be preferentially blocked than the Aδ nerve fibers. However, the proposal that isolated C fiber mediated analgesia with preserved Aδ fiber mediated cold and pinprick sensation after an ESPB is unlikely, has never been demonstrated and, thus, without sufficient evidence, cannot be attributed to the presumed analgesic effects of an ESPB.

Evaluation of a modified ultrasound-assisted technique for mid-thoracic epidural placement: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Although mid-thoracic epidural analgesia benefits patients undergoing major surgery, technical difficulties often discourage its use. Improvements in technology are warranted to improve the success rate on first pass and patient comfort. The previously reported ultrasound-assisted technique using a generic needle insertion site failed to demonstrate superiority over conventional landmark techniques. A stratified needle insertion site based on sonoanatomic features may improve the technique. METHODS: Patients who presented for elective abdominal or thoracic surgery requesting thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control were included in this observational study. A modified ultrasound-assisted technique using a stratified needle insertion site based on ultrasound images was adopted. The number of needle passes, needle skin punctures, procedure time, overall success rate, and incidence of procedure complications were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight subjects were included. The first-pass success and overall success rates were 75% (96/128) and 98% (126/128), respectively. In 95% (122/128) of patients, only one needle skin puncture was needed to access the epidural space. The median [IQR] time needed from needle insertion to access the epidural space was 59 [47-122] seconds. No complications were observed during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This modified ultrasound-assisted mid-thoracic epidural technique has the potential to improve success rates and reduce the needling time. The data shown in our study may be a feasible basis for a prospective study comparing our ultrasound-assisted epidural placements to conventional landmark-based techniques.

Differences in the association between epidural analgesia and length of stay by surgery type: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a decline in the use of thoracic epidural analgesia related in part to concerns for delayed discharge, it is unknown whether changes in length of stay (LOS) associated with epidural analgesia vary by surgery type. Therefore, we determined the degree to which the association between epidural analgesia (vs no epidural) and LOS differed by surgery type. METHODS: We conducted an observational study using data from 1747 patients who had either non-emergent open abdominal, thoracic, or vascular surgery at a single tertiary academic hospital. The primary outcome was hospital LOS and the incidence of a prolonged hospital LOS defined as 21 days or longer. Secondary endpoints included escalation of care, 30-day all-cause readmission, and reason for epidural not being placed. The association between epidural status and dichotomous endpoints was examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 1747 patients, 85.7% (1499) received epidural analgesia. 78% (1364) underwent abdominal, 11.5% (200) thoracic, and 10.5% (183) vascular surgeries. After adjustment for differences, receiving epidural analgesia (vs no epidural) was associated with a 45% reduction in the likelihood of a prolonged LOS (p<0.05). This relationship varied by surgery type: abdominal (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.79, p<0.001), vascular (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.17 to 16.1, p=0.14), and thoracic (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.20 to 5.70, p=0.93). Among abdominal surgical patients, epidural analgesia was associated with a median decrease in LOS by 1.4 days and a 37% reduction in the likelihood of 30-day readmission (adjusted OR 0.63, 0.41 to 0.97, p<0.05). Among thoracic surgical patients, epidural analgesia was associated with a median increase in LOS by 3.2 days. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between epidural analgesia and LOS appears to be different among different surgical populations.

Iliopsoas plane block does not improve pain after primary total hip arthroplasty in the presence of multimodal analgesia: a single institution randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical analgesic efficacy of iliopsoas plane block remains a subject of discussion. This study aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy of iliopsoas plane block under general anesthesia using multimodal analgesia. METHODS: Fifty-six adult patients who underwent elective primary hip arthroplasty were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either a single-shot iliopsoas plane block (10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine) or a sham block (10 mL normal saline). All patients received general anesthesia, multimodal analgesia (preoperative buprenorphine patch, 5 µg/h), intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) and nefopam (20 mg), and round-the-clock acetaminophen and celecoxib. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale pain score at rest 6 hour after surgery. RESULTS: Iliopsoas plane block did not have a notable advantage over the sham block in terms of pain relief at rest, as assessed by the numeric rating scale score, 6 hour after total hip arthroplasty (iliopsoas plane block: median, 4.0; IQR, 2.0-5.8; sham: median, 5.5; IQR, 2.3-6.8; median difference, -1.0; 95% CI -2.0 to 0.0; p≥0.999). Linear mixed model analysis showed no differences in pain scores, opioid consumption, quadriceps strength, or quality of recovery between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Iliopsoas plane block did not improve postoperative analgesia following total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia with a multimodal analgesic regimen. The blockade of sensory femoral branches supplying the anterior hip capsule using iliopsoas plane block may not yield additional benefits concerning patient outcomes in the aforementioned clinical context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05212038, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05212038.

Additive value of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block and serratus anterior plane block in lung transplantation surgery: a retrospective exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control following lung transplantation (LTx) surgery is paramount. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the gold standard; however, the potential use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and consequent anticoagulation therapy raises safety concerns, prompting clinicians to seek safer alternatives. The utility of thoracic wall blocks in general thoracic surgery is well established; however, their role in the context of LTx has been poorly investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective exploratory study, we assessed the effect of adding a superficial parasternal intercostal plane (sPIP) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block to standard anesthetic and analgesic care on tracheal extubation rates, pain scores and opioid consumption until 72 hours postoperatively in LTx. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the analysis; 35 received the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (control group), and 25 received sPIP and SAP blocks in addition to the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (intervention group). We observed higher tracheal extubation rates in the intervention group at 8 hours postoperatively (16.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.03). This was also shown after adjusting for known prognostic factors (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33, p=0.02). Furthermore, we noted a lower opioid consumption measured by morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours in the intervention group (median 405 (IQR 300-490) vs 266 (IQR 168-366), p=0.02). This was also found after adjusting for known prognostic factors (ß -118; 95% CI -221 to 14, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: sPIP and SAP blocks are safe regional analgesic techniques in LTx involving ECMO and clamshell incision. They are associated with faster tracheal extubation and lower opioid consumption. These techniques should be considered when TEA is not appropriate. Further high-quality studies are warranted to confirm these findings.